Pictures of the College of Business

FCB Working Paper Series

The FCB Working Paper Series provides FCB faculty with a convenient, in-house dissemination vehicle for working papers authored by FCB faculty. While the topics of such papers are subject to faculty selection, the overall criterion for acceptance in the Working Paper Series is that the working paper be mission-driven.

Specifically, papers should pertain to either instructional-based research or research to advance knowledge in the fields of business and economics, or be directly related to the outreach activities of the College. All faculty are invited and encouraged to submit working papers for inclusion in the Series in accordance with the Guidelines for Working Paper Series.

View the FCB Working Paper Series abstracts.

 


 

FCB Brown Bag Series

The W. A. Franke College of Business hosts periodic, voluntary presentations by FCB faculty on a variety of topics.  The brown bag series is organized by Chris Scherpereel. Please send him an email at Chris.Scherpereel@nau.edu if you are interested in giving a presentation or have further questions about any of the presentations.

All FCB seminars will take place in Room 346 from 1:30-2:30, unless otherwise noted. Following is the list of presentations for Spring 2008 (Links to abstracts below):

4/4 Dean Smith, “Energy and Water Use in Arizona Agriculture”.

4/11 12:30-1:30, “Teaching Evaluation Group”

4/18 Kathy Savage and Chris Scherpereel, “Aerial Chair Case”

4/25 Dean Smith, “Global Potentials”


 

FCB Brown Bag Spring 2008 Abstracts

“Energy and Water Use in Arizona Agriculture”
4/4 - Dean Smith

Abstract

Increasing energy and water concerns in Arizona are the driving forces to improve the efficiency of agricultural production within the state. In this article we address the energy and water uses in growing a variety of crops in Arizona. The goal of the research project is to identify and quantify all energy and water uses from the production of the initial seed, through the treatments of the soil and various chemical introductions, all the way until the crop is harvested in the field. Thus, the analysis is “from seed to the edge of the field.” Using a series of secondary data sources, the paper provides ranges for the energy and water consumption for the predominant crops grown in the major agriculture areas of the state.

“Teaching Evaluation Group”
4/11 - 12:30-1:30

 

 

“Aerial Chair Case”
4/18 - Kathy Savage and Chris Scherpereel

Abstract

In 1996 Craig Hines sold his first Aerial Chair. The chair was a design that he personally developed and manufactured in a small shop in Montana. He originally developed the Aerial chair out of curiosity, and for his own personal use. The concept became his passion, so he began trying to find customers for his product. Product interest was sporadic and material costs drove the price up to a premium level. In December 2000, the Aerial Chair was still not a commercial success, and many of Craig’s marketing attempts had failed. He was faced with the decision of how to best create a viable business around the Aerial Chair product.Craig Hines never wanted to be influenced by external factors that might hinder his creativity in developing and promoting the Aerial Chair, consequently, he never developed a functioning business plan. The industry in which he was attempting to enter was already established with several direct competitors, and many substitute products were available. Given the high manufacturing cost and inventory requirements, mass distribution outlets seemed unlikely to carry the Aerial Chair. Although Craig had learned a great deal through trial and error, he still remained unsure of the demand for the Aerial Chair. This uncertainty regarding demand, the high material costs, and the difficulty accessing distribution channels, convinced Craig that his current ad hoc approach to building a company would not create the successful company he envisioned.

“Global Potentials”
4/25 - Dean Smith

Abstract

According to Human Development Report 2007/2008 there are 1.577 billion people in the world without electricity, from which 1.569 billion are from developing countries. It creates a question: Should they start with a coal for their electricity needs as developed world did in 19th century or could they leapfrog to the renewable energy technologies? Mostly, developed countries in the world understand a problem of carbon emission and issue of climate change. One of the adaptation options according to the IPCC AR4 report is renewable energy such as wind and solar energy. Moreover, prices and security of oil and natural gas are not surely predictable. In this paper we investigate the possibilities for small to mid-sized distributed electricity and co-consumption systems. Using three countries as case studies, Brazil, Kenya and Uganda, we explore the possible use of electricity as development tool.

Faculty will be given the opportunity to ask questions and express opinions.

Faculty and Staff

© 2006-2008 Arizona Board of Regents.
Northern Arizona University, South San Francisco Street, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011